Current:Home > InvestIndexbit Exchange:Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -FundSphere
Indexbit Exchange:Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Robert Brown View
Date:2025-04-10 01:04:09
A federal court on Indexbit ExchangeWednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (689)
Related
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- RHOSLC's Monica Garcia Shares She's Pregnant With Mystery Boyfriend's Baby on Viall Files
- Henry Smith: Summary of the Australian Stock Market in 2023
- Former NFL linebacker Terrell Suggs faces charges from Starbucks drive-thru incident
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- As his trans daughter struggles, a father pushes past his prejudice. ‘It was like a wake-up’
- Western Conservationists and Industry Each Tout Wins in a Pair of Rulings From the Same Court
- Experts say Wisconsin woman who at 12 nearly killed girl isn’t ready to leave psychiatric center
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Inflation came in hot at 3.5% in March, CPI report shows. Fed could delay rate cuts.
Ranking
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- Nashville school shooting families accuse senator of using bill to get his way in records lawsuit
- Massachusetts House budget writers propose spending on emergency shelters, public transit
- Shannen Doherty, Holly Marie Combs and More Charmed Stars Set for Magical Reunion
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- Frozen Four times, TV for NCAA men's hockey tournament, Hobey Baker Award
- Massachusetts city agrees to $900,000 settlement for death of a 30-year-old woman in custody
- Bridgerton Season 3 Trailer’s Scandalous Romance is the Object of All Your Desires
Recommendation
Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
3-year-old 'fought for her life' during fatal 'exorcism' involving mom, grandpa: Prosecutors
Iowa puts $1 million toward summer meal sites, still faces criticism for rejecting federal funds
Oakland’s airport considers adding ‘San Francisco’ to its name. San Francisco isn’t happy about it
Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
Arizona abortion ruling upends legal and political landscape from Phoenix to Washington
Got kids? Here’s what to know about filing your 2023 taxes
Justice Neil Gorsuch is not pleased with judges setting nationwide policy. But how common is it?